<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SIA:  Binding Wars- Tyrolia/Head and Salomon/Atomic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://14erskiers.com/blog/2012/02/sia-binding-wars-tyroliahead-and-salomonatomic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://14erskiers.com/blog/2012/02/sia-binding-wars-tyroliahead-and-salomonatomic/</link>
	<description>Living and sharing our dreams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 19:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://14erskiers.com/blog/2012/02/sia-binding-wars-tyroliahead-and-salomonatomic/comment-page-1/#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14erskiers.com/blog/?p=2149#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>Got to ski around for a bit on the Guardian bindings today.  The lower stack height is noticeable, and they definitely ski like a good alpine binding.  The AFD is fixed, however, so skiing these with a rubber soled AT boot is a gutsy proposition.  It&#039;s too bad, because if they hold up they might have been worth having, but I wouldn&#039;t feel comfortable at all putting a rubber soled boot in that binding.  I&#039;ll pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to ski around for a bit on the Guardian bindings today.  The lower stack height is noticeable, and they definitely ski like a good alpine binding.  The AFD is fixed, however, so skiing these with a rubber soled AT boot is a gutsy proposition.  It&#8217;s too bad, because if they hold up they might have been worth having, but I wouldn&#8217;t feel comfortable at all putting a rubber soled boot in that binding.  I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://14erskiers.com/blog/2012/02/sia-binding-wars-tyroliahead-and-salomonatomic/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14erskiers.com/blog/?p=2149#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>It IS a tough one, Keith, at least for those of us who drank the Dynafit Kool-aid and decided it was simply sugar, food coloring, and artificial flavor.  I&#039;m afraid there wasn&#039;t anything else to take note of besides going with Dynafit/Tech bindings or Fritchis as far as true touring bindings go.  Basically Fritchis are much more user friendly and tech bindings are much lighter and are rock solid when you&#039;re skiing.  Tough call.  Although if you haven&#039;t broken your Naxos and don&#039;t despise them, you&#039;ll probably love Fritchis.

Perhaps Lars Chickering-Ayers is on the right track, sliding a dynafit toe in like a splitboard binding and then sliding in an alpine toe for the descent.  Super high fiddle factor though, among a number of issues.  Handfull of bindings out there getting tested right now from what I hear..

Feel free to get your aerospace on and design something better.  Just remember consumers can&#039;t afford the same toys as NASA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It IS a tough one, Keith, at least for those of us who drank the Dynafit Kool-aid and decided it was simply sugar, food coloring, and artificial flavor.  I&#8217;m afraid there wasn&#8217;t anything else to take note of besides going with Dynafit/Tech bindings or Fritchis as far as true touring bindings go.  Basically Fritchis are much more user friendly and tech bindings are much lighter and are rock solid when you&#8217;re skiing.  Tough call.  Although if you haven&#8217;t broken your Naxos and don&#8217;t despise them, you&#8217;ll probably love Fritchis.</p>
<p>Perhaps Lars Chickering-Ayers is on the right track, sliding a dynafit toe in like a splitboard binding and then sliding in an alpine toe for the descent.  Super high fiddle factor though, among a number of issues.  Handfull of bindings out there getting tested right now from what I hear..</p>
<p>Feel free to get your aerospace on and design something better.  Just remember consumers can&#8217;t afford the same toys as NASA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://14erskiers.com/blog/2012/02/sia-binding-wars-tyroliahead-and-salomonatomic/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://14erskiers.com/blog/?p=2149#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Other than weight, I&#039;ve been enjoying my first pair of Dukes on my Folsoms. Tour smooth, rock solid, etc.

What I&#039;ve been puzzling over is what will replace my Naxos on my lighter A/T setup when it&#039;s time to replace it. Hard to cut through the chaff of the Dynafit/Fritschi wars on bulletin boards, etc. with staunch encampment on both sides. When the Marker Tour came out I was pretty thrilled...until I read how it reviewed (and liked to break).

Was there anything at SIA in that &quot;no man&#039;s land&quot; category binding wise? Somewhere between Dynafit and Fritschi? I guess I would be leaning towards Fritschi, assuming they keep evolving and improving, but there is no killer in my mind, no obvious choice.

Maybe I&#039;m just elitist because I build aerospace stuff for a living and know that materials and engineering exist right now to make a binding that hammers like a Duke but weighs close to a Fritschi or Naxo. I got excited at the beginning of your blog entry here until I saw a) that no major weight losses were incurred by either and b) Tyrolia had a complete plastic bridge plate. Arrrgh!

It was cool to see free flex coming back though. Ironically, I remember Marker piston bindings (front side stuff as you remember a few years back), I had a pair. Then they completely eschewed that concept on their next evolution of binding, only to see it come back from their competitors.

Anyway...still waiting for the lighter weight A/T killer....

Good writeups btw, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than weight, I&#8217;ve been enjoying my first pair of Dukes on my Folsoms. Tour smooth, rock solid, etc.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve been puzzling over is what will replace my Naxos on my lighter A/T setup when it&#8217;s time to replace it. Hard to cut through the chaff of the Dynafit/Fritschi wars on bulletin boards, etc. with staunch encampment on both sides. When the Marker Tour came out I was pretty thrilled&#8230;until I read how it reviewed (and liked to break).</p>
<p>Was there anything at SIA in that &#8220;no man&#8217;s land&#8221; category binding wise? Somewhere between Dynafit and Fritschi? I guess I would be leaning towards Fritschi, assuming they keep evolving and improving, but there is no killer in my mind, no obvious choice.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just elitist because I build aerospace stuff for a living and know that materials and engineering exist right now to make a binding that hammers like a Duke but weighs close to a Fritschi or Naxo. I got excited at the beginning of your blog entry here until I saw a) that no major weight losses were incurred by either and b) Tyrolia had a complete plastic bridge plate. Arrrgh!</p>
<p>It was cool to see free flex coming back though. Ironically, I remember Marker piston bindings (front side stuff as you remember a few years back), I had a pair. Then they completely eschewed that concept on their next evolution of binding, only to see it come back from their competitors.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;still waiting for the lighter weight A/T killer&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good writeups btw, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

